Restoring form, function and aesthetics - A comprehensive review of maxillofacial prosthetics.
Background: The goal of maxillofacial prosthetics is to provide patients with custom-designed prostheses
that mimic natural facial structures, allowing them to regain vital functions like speech, mastication,
swallowing, and facial expressions. It will take a multidisciplinary team with experience in prosthodontics,
oral and maxillofacial surgery, otolaryngology, and facial plastic surgery to advance this field.
Material and Methods: A comprehensive examination of pertinent research and publications in the field
of maxillofacial prosthetics was carried out. Using preset keywords pertaining to maxillofacial prosthetics,
prosthesis materials, fabrication methods, and patient outcomes, searches were conducted across electronic
databases, such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Selected articles addressing developments,
challenges, and prospects in maxillofacial prosthetics went through screening and eligibility criteria.
Results: Significant advances in materials and fabrication methods, such as the use of silicone elastomers,
CAD/CAM technology, and 3D printing, were found in the literature analysis. Two other essential
components of maxillofacial prosthetic care that have emerged are interdisciplinary collaboration and
patient-reported outcomes. On the other hand, difficulties with prosthesis stability, upkeep, and
biointegration were noted, highlighting the need for more study and advancement in the area.
Conclusion: The review emphasizes the significant advancements in patient-centered care,
interdisciplinary collaboration, fabrication techniques, and materials that have led to significant progress in
maxillofacial prosthetics. In order to improve patient care and quality of life, this review advocates for
ongoing advancements in maxillofacial prosthetics and offers insightful information to clinicians,
researchers, and educators.
that mimic natural facial structures, allowing them to regain vital functions like speech, mastication,
swallowing, and facial expressions. It will take a multidisciplinary team with experience in prosthodontics,
oral and maxillofacial surgery, otolaryngology, and facial plastic surgery to advance this field.
Material and Methods: A comprehensive examination of pertinent research and publications in the field
of maxillofacial prosthetics was carried out. Using preset keywords pertaining to maxillofacial prosthetics,
prosthesis materials, fabrication methods, and patient outcomes, searches were conducted across electronic
databases, such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Selected articles addressing developments,
challenges, and prospects in maxillofacial prosthetics went through screening and eligibility criteria.
Results: Significant advances in materials and fabrication methods, such as the use of silicone elastomers,
CAD/CAM technology, and 3D printing, were found in the literature analysis. Two other essential
components of maxillofacial prosthetic care that have emerged are interdisciplinary collaboration and
patient-reported outcomes. On the other hand, difficulties with prosthesis stability, upkeep, and
biointegration were noted, highlighting the need for more study and advancement in the area.
Conclusion: The review emphasizes the significant advancements in patient-centered care,
interdisciplinary collaboration, fabrication techniques, and materials that have led to significant progress in
maxillofacial prosthetics. In order to improve patient care and quality of life, this review advocates for
ongoing advancements in maxillofacial prosthetics and offers insightful information to clinicians,
researchers, and educators.