Authors : Neeteesh K Shukla, Nimmi Gupta, Sneha Singh, Shivam Verma, Parnita Dwivedi
DOI : 10.18231/j.ijohd.2021.062
Volume : 7
Issue : 4
Year : 2021
Page No : 310-315
Following article is the review and presentation of various methodologies of canine retraction [e.g.– methods under sliding and friction less mechanics, facilitation with TADs (Temporary Anchorage Devices) and MOPs (Micro-Osteo-Perforations), and invasive procedures etc.] and comparison of these methods in terms of rate of canine retraction, and molar anchorage loss. Patient’s age ranges between 15y to 19y and only right maxillary canine was taken for comparison purpose.
Keywords: Canine retraction, Coil springs, Distraction, Microosteoperforations, T loop.