Authors : Rahul Rathi*, Vaishnavi Kayarkar, Amol Verulkar, Akshay Mahajan, Sara Bhurani, Aishwarrya Padmanaban
DOI : 10.18231/j.ijohd.2023.004
Volume : 9
Issue : 1
Year : 2023
Page No : 18-27
Background: Our purpose in this systematic review is to compare the lingual Vs labial orthodontic and overview the mental and physical outcomes in young boys and girls.
Methodology: From 2012 to 2022, we conducted a literature search of publications that had been published in PubMed Medline, the Cochrane Library, and additional sources (Google Scholar, clinicaltrails.gov). We screened the main electronic databases. Due to the nature of the review, all sorts of studies were considered, including descriptive studies, surveys, reviews, commentaries, and editorials. In the current investigation, the recommended methodology was used to assess the risk of bias. Six distinct domains were addressed using the two-part technique.
Result: The present systematic review yielded 1500 articles on initial search; first 715 duplicate publications were removed. After screening additional 590 articles were excluded and 124 full articles were assessed for the study. 14 studies concentrating upon the current status of the orthodontic study. 14 studies concentrating upon the current status of orthodontic Curriculum comparison of lingual and labial orthodontic patients were included in this systematic review.
Conclusion: From the result, we can conclude that the lingual appliance group scored much higher than the buccal appliance group. During the first 2-4 weeks after lingual brackets were inserted, the majority of lingual patients saw gradual improvements in their oral impairment.
Keywords: Lingual vs labial, Orthodontic appliances, Systematic review.