Ritu Saha

Ritu Saha

Profile ID RP-000-6020 Joined 2023-01-22 2 articles
1
Total Views
2
Total Publications
3
Publication Views

Articles(2)

Authors: Ritu Saha, Afzalunnessa Binte Lutfor, Arpita Deb, Taskina Akhter, Tamanna Sultana

DOI: 10.18231/j.ijmr.2019.029  

Volume6

Issue2

Pages135-141

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary tract infection is still one of the most common infections among all age groups. The causative microorgnisms of UTI and their sensitivity to different antibiotics varies in different areas, and changes with time. This necessitates periodic studies of the causative uropathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern. Aim: To observe the profile of common uropathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns to commonly used antimicrobial agents. Materials and Methods: A contemplative study was done at the department of Microbiology of Ad-din Women’s Medical College, Dhaka (AWMCH), Bangladesh, during January to December, 2017. Clean-catch midstream urine samples were collected from 7139 suspected urinary tract infection patients of different age and sex groups. Uropathogens were identified by standard microbiological techniques and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was determined by Kirby Bauer Disc diffusion method following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Result: In this study, Out of 7139 patients, 1664 (23.3%) were growth positive for urine cultures. Majority of the patients (88.5%, 6315/7139) were female. The predominant isolate was E. coli 712 (42.8%), followed by Coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CONS) 589 (35.4%), Acinetobacter 126 (7.5%), Enterobacter spp. 72 (4.3%), Klebsiella spp. 62 (3.7%), Enterococcus spp. & Proteus spp. 16 (1.9%). Imipe­nem (92%), amikacin (83.8%), piperacillin- tazobactum (85.4%), gentamycin (69.4%), levofloxacin (65.6%) shows higher sensitivity to Gram negative bacteria, whereas high resistance to ampicillin (17%), cephradin (11.8%), cotrim (26%) and amoxiclav (28%) were observed. On the other hand, Gram positive bacteria showed high resistance to nalidixic acid (70-95%), erythromy­cin (68-90%), and high sensitivity to nitrofurantoin, meropenem, vancomycin and linezolid. Vancomycin, linezolid and nitrofurantoin for Gram positive bacteria and amikacin, meropenem, pipercillin tazobactam, and colistin for Gram negative bacteria are still useful. As an empirical antibiotic against Gram negative organisms, amoxyclav is less effective as only 20% pathogens were susceptible. Both Gram positive and negative bacteria are highly resistance to quinolones, nitrofurantoin and cephalosporins with few exceptions. Conclusion: Empiric antimicrobial agents should be selected on the basis of current antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the uropathogens prevalent in that area. Keywords: Uropthogens, Urinary tract infection, Current Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern.

View Article

Authors: Ritu Saha*, Mahmuda Hassan, Nishat Tamanna Nur, Humayra Shahjahan, Afzalunnessa Binte Lutfor

DOI: 10.18231/j.ijmr.2020.069  

Volume10

Issue2

Pages60-67

Abstract

Purpose: Bloodstream infections by bacterial pathogens are major cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries. The aim of this study was to identify the bacterial pathogens causing bloodstream infections in certain areas of Dhaka, Bangladesh and determine their antibiotic susceptibility pattern according to age group. Materials and Methods: A total of 6095 blood samples were collected from patients attending at Ad-din Women’s Medical College & Hospital from July 2019 to December 2020. All the blood samples were processed for culture using a BACT/Alert blood culture machine. Further identification & antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using standard microbiological procedures. Results: Overall, 10.6% of the cultured blood samples were growth positive. Out of them, Gram-negative bacilli were predominant. Blood stream infection rate is highest among neonates, followed by the age group of 1-15 years, adult patients, with minimum rate observed among the age group of 1 month- 1 Year. was the most frequently isolated among the Growth positive samples, followed by Coagulase negative (CONS), , , species. The most frequently isolated pathogens among Neonates were Coagulase negative Spp, and Spp; whereas was most commonly isolated pathogen among pediatrics and adult age group (p=

View Article

No matching articles

Try another word from the title, author or DOI.