A clinicoepidemiological and histo-Pathological study of polymorphic light eruptions in malwa region

Authors : Krishnendra Verma, Krishnendra Verma, Richa Rokde, Richa Rokde, Ujjwal Singh, Ujjwal Singh

DOI : 10.18231/2581-4729.2019.0006

Volume : 5

Issue : 1

Year : 2019

Page No : 24-29

Introduction

Materials and Methods

It was a prospective observational study undertaken to study clinicoepidemiology and significance of histopathology in polymorphic light eruptions in adults. We excluded patients aged less than 18years, photoaggravated dermatoses induced by drugs, chemicals and with genetic and metabolic disorders. A total of 100 cases with polymorphic light eruption attending Out Patient Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy at C.R. Gardi Hospital, attached to R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain (Madhya Pradesh) of Malwa region within the period of one year were randomly recruited for present study. All patients enrolled were above 18 years of age. Informed written consent was taken for their inclusion in the study. Detailed history, general, systemic and dermatological examination was done. A pre- structured proforma was used to collect above information, which also included month, age of onset of symptoms, severity, nature, aggravating factors, constitutional symptoms, family, past and drug history, occupation, duration of exposure to sunlight, outdoor  activities, type of clothing, usage of cosmetics, sunscreens and previous treatment. Patient was clinically examined under headings of skin type (Fitzpatrick skin phototype scale), type of lesion, size, shape, colour, site, symmetry, associated symptoms, aggravating and relieving factors. All routine investigations like complete blood count, random blood sugar, liver enzymes, urine analysis and biopsy were carried out in all the cases. Photopatch testing was not done. Punch biopsy of each and every patient was done to find significant findings. (We aimed to study clinicoepidemiological and histopathological aspect of PLE). Obtained data was compiled, tabulated, summarized and manual statistical analysis done. Prior approval for the study and the protocol was obtained from the ethical committee.

Results

Prevalence of PLE calculated was 5% in Malwa region. Total 100 cases participated in the study, the minimum and maximum age were 18 and 66 years respectively. There were 61 females and 39 males with male to female ratio of 1:1.56. The majority of cases were found in the age group of 35-40 years (28%) followed by 30-35 years (19%). 71% cases were Hindus and only 19% Muslims were observed, reason for lesser prevalence in Muslims could be proper covering of the sun-exposed areas. Around 29% were illiterate patients, followed by who studied till high school (23%), middle school (21%), graduates & post graduates (16%) and then primary school (11%). In our study, maximum patients were farmers and labourers (38%) by occupation, while 18% were housewives. According to the Kuppuswamy classification, majority of cases belonged to the lower middle class i.e. 56% patients. Only 8% had family history of PLE. In the conducted study, 45% cases had skin type IV, 29% type V and type III (26%). Duration of disease in maximum cases was in between one to two months (36%), 32% patient had less than one month of duration. Majority of patients reported to us in late winters during the months of late January to early March (44%) and 33% in early summers. Maximum prevalence during late winters can be attributed to sun-bathing which is quite frequently practised in India. Most common type of lesion observed was papular i.e. 48%, followed by mixed presentation of papules and plaques in 27% of cases. Only 5 cases had macular eruption that too was mixed picture. 24% patients had lesions over neck and ‘V’ area of chest, 18% over extensor aspect of upper limbs. In most of the cases multiple sites were involved, generally over exposed parts but unexposed parts were also affected in few cases. 67% patients had lesions associated with itching, 21% were asymptomatic and remaining had burning sensation. Almost 52% of total cases had given the history of recurrence, transient in 20% and persistent in remaining. Biopsy was done in all the 100 cases. On histopathology examination, majority of slides 42% revealed spongiosis, oedema of papillary dermis and dense perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in upper and mid dermis. These findings are characteristic of polymorphic light eruption. 18% of histology samples showed hyperkeratosis, oedema of papillary dermis and dense perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in upper and mid dermis while few samples showed non-specific features.

 

Click here to view

Graph 1: Distribution of cases according to sex

Click here to view

Graph 2: Distribution of cases according to Age

Click here to view

Graph 3: Distribution of cases according to types of lesion

Click here to view

Graph 4: Distribution of cases according sites affected

Table 2: Distribution of cases according to skin types

Types of skin type	Colour	No. of patients (N)	Percent (%)
Type I	Ivory	0	0
Type II	Beige	0	0
Type III	Medium brown	26	26
Type IV	Dark brown	45	45
Type V	Very dark brown	29	29
Total		100	100

Table 3: Distribution of cases according to Duration

Duration (in months)	No. of Patients	Percent (%)
<1month>	32	32
1-2months	41	41
2-3months	18	18
3-4months	5	5
4-5months	2	2
5-6months	0	0
>6months	2	2
Total	100	100.0

Table 4: Distribution of cases according to histopathological findings

Histopathology	No. of patients (N)	Percent (%)
1, 4, 5	42	42
1, 3, 4, 5	4	4
1, 4, 5, 6	5	5
1, 5	10	10
1, 5, 6	3	3
2, 4, 5	18	18
2, 4, 5, 6	4	4
2, 5	10	10
2, 5, 6	4	4
Total	100	100.0

Keywords: 1 Spongiosis, 2- Hyperkeratosis, 3- Focal lymphocyte exocytosis, 4- Oedema of papillary dermis, 5- Dense perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate is present in upper and mid dermis, 6- Hydropic degeneration of basal cells.

Some Clinical and Histopathological images of patients studied.

Click here to view

Fig. 1: showing discrete papules and plaques over back of nec

Click here to view

Fig. 2: Maculopapular lesions present over back.

Click here to view

Fig. 3: Showing lichenified plaque over extensor aspect of forearm.

Click here to view

Fig. 4: Multiple macules and papules are present over face.

Click here to view

Fig. 5: Histopathology slide showing mild spongiosis and focal interface change.

Click here to view

Fig. 6: Histopathological slide showing superficial and deep lymhocytic infiltrate.

Discussion

Polymorphic light eruption being the most common type of photodermatosis. Its prevalence in India is 0.56%.^[3] The present study was done in Ujjain district of Malwa region in Madhya Pradesh which is at a latitude of 23°09’ N and longitude of 75°43’ E. Tropic of cancer passes through Ujjain, here weather experience two distinct seasons of extreme hot summers and winters. People living in this region are in continuous exposure to sun and its rays. Prevalence of PLE calculated is 5% in Malwa region.

We included 100 cases, which showed female predominance, similar to other studies.^[11],^[12],^[13],^[14],^[15],^[16]In our study, maximum patients were farmers and labourers constituting 38% as major population of Malwa region comprise of farmers, followed by housewives (16%) and students (12%) similarly Chacko E et al in 2017 also showed maximum prevalence in farmers (29%).^[8]. While other studies showed higher incidence in housewives.^[13],^[14],^[15],^[16]As per Fitzpatrick classification of skin type, type IV (dark brown) showed maximum prevalence (45%) of PLE, followed by type V (very dark brown) 29% then type III (medium brown) 26% in our study. Our results corresponded with a study conducted by Baliah K et al.^[13] Majority of patients reported to us in late winters during the months of late January to early March (44%) and 33% in early summers. Sharma D et al in their study got highest prevalence (76%) in summers while just 24% in winters.^[11] Sharma L et al in 2008 recorded 20.9% of prevalence in the month of March similar to our study and 15% in the month of September.^[16] Maximum prevalence during late winters can be attributed to sun-bathing which is quite frequently practised in India. We observed papular eruptions as the most common lesions in 48% cases followed by mixed presentation of papules and plaques (27%), which corresponded with other studies. In our study majority of the patients showed involvement of two or more sites of which neck and ‘V’ area of the chest were commonest comprising 24%, followed by forearms (18%). It was also observed that if single area was involved, then neck was found to be more affected then forearms in more than 50% of cases. Some studies also favoured this observation while others reported forearms as the most common site affected. 52% cases showed recurrence of disease similar to Chacko et al.^[12] In our study, majority of histopathology slides revealed spongiosis, oedema of papillary dermis and dense perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in upper and mid dermis comprising of 42%, but similar findings can be seen in lupus erythematosus, eczema, lichen planus and few others. Similar to our study, Sharma D et al also found spongiosis, oedema of papillary dermis and lymphocytic infiltrate in 32.95% slides.^[11] while Baliah K et al revealed hyperkeratosis, acanthosis and deep perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate as the most common finding.^[13]

Conclusion

Polymorphic light eruption is the most common photodermatoses in Indian scenario. Its prevalence in Malwa region is 5%. A slight female gender predominance (61%) and adult age of presentation (30-40years) is a consistent finding in our study. Patients are mainly farmers and labourers by occupation. Majority had Type IV skin type. Pruritus was the most common symptom observed. The commonest lesions observed were papular seen over the neck and ‘V’ area of chest. Polymorphism in the clinical lesions is typical. Histopathological findings were specific but not diagnostic. Diagnosis is usually based on the clinical signs and symptoms, histopathology can be done in atypical cases. Recurrence is the rule if protective measures are not taken. Proper information regarding the disease and appropriate precautionary measures to be taken will help in reducing the incidence of disease.

Conflict of Interest: None.

 

References

1. a, b, c C. Pao, P. G. Norris, M. Corbett and J. L. Hawl, “Polymorphic Light Eruption: Prevalence in Australia and England,” Br J Dermatol 130:1;1994;62-64. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1994.tb06884.x
2. a, b, c  P. S. Murthy, P. K. Kar, S. Grover and R. Rajagopal, “Polymorphous Light Eruption in a Ground Crew,” Indian J Aerospace Med 50;1;2006, 39-43.
3. a, b, c L. Sharma and A. Basnet, “Clinico Epidemiological Study of Polymorphic Light Eruption,” Indian J Dermatol, Venereology and Leprology, 74;1, 2008: 597-602. doi:10.4103/0378-6323.38400
4. ^  U. Mastalier and H. Keri, “Clinical, Laboratory, PhotoTest and Phototherapy Findings in Polymorphic Light Eruption: A Retrospective Study of 133 Patients,” Eur J Dermatol 8; 8;1998:554-559.
5. a, b W. L. Morison and R. S. Stern, “Polymorphic Light Eruption: A Common Reaction Uncommonly Recognized,” Acta Dermatol-Venereologica, Vol. 62, No. 3, 1982, pp. 237- 240.
6. ^ Kerr HA, Lim HW. Photodermatoses in African Americans: a retrospective analysis of 135 patients over a 7-year period. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;57:638-643.
7. ^ Nakamura M, Henderson M, Jacobsen G, et al. Comparison of photodermatoses in African- Americans and Caucasians: a follow-up study. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2013;29(6):337-338.
8. a, b Wadhwani AR, Sharma VK, Ramam M, et al. A clinical study of the spectrum of photodermatoses in dark- skinned populations. Clin Exp Dermatol 2013;8:823-829.
9. ^ Deng D, Hang Y, Chen H, et al. Prevalence of Photodermatosis in four regions at different altitudes in Yunnan province, China. J Dermatol 2006;33:537-540.
10. ^ P. G. Norris, J. Morris, D. M. McGibbon, C. Chu, J. L. Hawk, “Polymorphic Light Eruption: An Immuno Pathological Study of Evolving Lesions,” Br J Dermatol 120; 2:1989;173-183.
11. a, b, c Sharma D, Dhillon K S. Polymorphic light eruption: A clinicoepidemiological study. Paripex- Indian J Res 2017;6(4): 661-663.
12. a, b Chacko E, Vellaisamy SG, Gopalan K, Nanjappachetty G. A clinic-epidemilogical study of polymorphic light eruption in a tertiary care centre in Salem: a region of South India. Int J Res Dermatol 2017;3:113-119.
13. a, b, c, d  Baliah K, Maduravasagam K, Radhakrishnan L, Jambulingam J. A prospective observational study on clinico - pathological correlation in polymorphous light eruption. IOSR J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS) 2016;15(10):01-7.
14. a, b Deshmukh A R, Pathrikar S S, Khedkar M Y, Mahajan K R, Sherasiya B S. A clinicoepidemiological study of polymorphous light eruption in Marathwada region. Intl J Recent Trends Sci Technol 2015;17(2):128-130.
15. a, b Pullabatla P, Kaliyaperumal KP, Sindhu U. A Clinico-Pathological Study of Polymorphous light eruption. J Cosmetics, Dermatol Sci Appl 2012;2;219-223.
16. a, b, c Sharma L, Basnet A. A clinicoepidemiological study of polymorphic light eruption. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008;74:15-17.

Citation Data